Watch Janet Jackson destroy Kamala Harris when she interviewed about the current state of politics.
Let’s just say she isn’t sold on Kamala Harris. Well this didn’t go over well with The View because we know they hate Donald Trump with a passion so this story is more of a distraction than a talking point for them.
The bottom line is Donald Trump did not initiate this conversation Rachel Scott from ABC did that. And its actually hurt Kamala Harris more than Donald Trump.
This excerpt discusses a variety of political and social issues, particularly focusing on an interview with Janet Jackson and her comments about Kamala Harris. The speaker critiques the media’s portrayal of Black identity, particularly in relation to Harris, suggesting that there is a double standard when it comes to questioning her racial identity compared to other prominent Black figures.
Here are some key points covered:
Janet Jackson’s Comments: Jackson’s remarks about Harris’s racial identity are highlighted, including her reference to Harris’s heritage and her uncertainty about whether America is ready for a Black female president.
→ Swipe to see more articles
Critique of Media Representation: The speaker expresses frustration with how the media handles discussions about race, particularly when it involves Black individuals questioning another Black person’s identity.
Double Standards in Identity: There’s a discussion about how certain prominent Black figures, like Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, do not face the same scrutiny regarding their racial identity as Kamala Harris does. The speaker implies that Harris’s mixed heritage contributes to this scrutiny.
Identity Politics: The speaker seems to be critical of the political implications of identity and how they can be used or manipulated, especially in the context of elections and representation.
Rhetoric and Accents: There is a suggestion that Harris adjusts her presentation or language based on her audience, raising questions about authenticity.
If you want to dive deeper into any specific aspect of this discussion or have questions about related topics, feel free to ask!
This segment continues to discuss Kamala Harris’s political identity and her responses to questions regarding race, reparations, and her consistency in addressing these issues. Here are the main points:
Identity and Authenticity: The speaker argues that Harris’s mixed racial identity raises questions about her authenticity and commitment to both Black and Indigenous issues. They express frustration that Harris doesn’t seem to engage deeply with the political and social issues affecting these communities.
Reparations Discussion: Harris’s response to questions about reparations is highlighted, noting that she suggests creating a commission to study the issue rather than taking a definitive stance on providing reparations. The speaker criticizes this approach as being inconsistent and politically opportunistic.
Political Strategy: The speaker believes that Harris adjusts her rhetoric based on the audience and context, portraying herself differently depending on what is politically advantageous. They provide examples of her statements at different events to illustrate this point.
Historical Context: The speaker emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the historical injustices faced by Black Americans, such as slavery and systemic discrimination. They argue that a genuine engagement with these issues would require more than just surface-level acknowledgments.
Calls for Action: There is a call for more concrete actions and commitments from Harris regarding reparations and addressing racial disparities, arguing that mere studies or commissions are insufficient.
The discussion is quite critical of Harris’s approach, framing it as a lack of commitment to the issues faced by her communities. If you’d like to explore any specific aspects further or have questions, let me know
