**Representative Jasmine Crockett Shreds Hysterical Mega Republicans in Fiery Congressional Speech**

In a stunning display of political firepower, Representative Jasmine Crockett from Texas took the floor of Congress and dismantled the rhetoric of a hysterical mega Republican in front of the entire assembly. Crockett, known for her sharp wit and unflinching commitment to justice, expertly deconstructed the narrative put forth by Republican Congressman Mr. Hunt, who had accused the Biden administration of flooding the country with “illegal immigrants” and tying it to national security threats. What followed was a moment of legislative brilliance that not only countered these claims but left the audience in awe of Crockett’s command of the facts and her fearless defense of immigrants.

The Preceding Accusations: A Platform for Fear-Mongering

Mr. Hunt’s speech began with typical inflammatory rhetoric—blaming the Biden administration for an influx of “illegal immigrants” that he argued were a national security threat. He claimed that the Democratic party, under Joe Biden and other officials, had enabled a flood of immigrants into the country using various visa programs, even calling for tighter restrictions and reforms on immigration.

He spoke of individuals he claimed were high-risk, linking their presence at the southern border to a broader narrative of fear and national security. He particularly highlighted the case of Egyptian national Muhammad Sabri Solomon, who allegedly used a flamethrower and Molotov cocktails in an attack in Boulder, Colorado, to support his argument that the Biden administration’s immigration policies were failing. Hunt suggested that the Biden administration’s actions were directly responsible for such incidents.

He further pushed his agenda by citing supposed failures of immigration law enforcement, labeling the current immigration system as broken and in dire need of reform. But Crockett was not buying it.

Crockett’s Fiery Rebuttal: Exposing Hypocrisy and Pushing for Reality

Once Hunt had finished, Crockett took the floor. Her calm demeanor belied the fury that would soon follow. She began by pointing out the hypocrisy of the Republican narrative that cast immigrants as criminals, instantly suspecting anyone from another country of potential wrongdoing. She called out the xenophobic undertones of Hunt’s arguments, stressing that painting every immigrant with the same broad brush as a threat to national security was not only unfounded but harmful.

“What they’re doing is using fear to drive policy,” Crockett declared, drawing a sharp contrast between the manufactured outrage and the reality of immigration. She pointed out that the vast majority of immigrants coming into the U.S. were not criminals, but individuals seeking a better life. She also took a subtle jab at her Republican colleagues, stating, “When you start deciding that just because someone came from another country, they are automatically some kind of criminal, that does sound kind of xenophobic to me.”

Crockett’s argument was not just based on emotional appeal. She brought hard facts into the conversation, emphasizing that the actions taken by Republicans—revoking visas, pushing travel bans, and altering immigration processes—jeopardized America’s future, particularly its economy and security. She argued that the reforms being pushed by Republicans would weaken the nation’s ability to thrive, hurting innovation and healthcare, two sectors that heavily rely on immigrant labor and talent.

A Focus on the Visa System and Immigrant Contributions

Crockett moved on to the subject of visa programs, which Mr. Hunt had framed as tools for undermining national security. She did not shy away from challenging the logic behind the visa restrictions and the impact such changes would have on U.S. prosperity. One of her key points was the importance of certain visa programs, like the J and M visas, which brought in foreign talent that bolstered the economy. These programs, Crockett argued, allowed universities to thrive, helped address critical healthcare shortages, and contributed significantly to the U.S. workforce.

“J visa holders contribute \$43.8 billion to the U.S. economy and support over 300,000 jobs,” she pointed out, stressing the importance of these visa categories to American innovation and economic success. She then pivoted to the broader issue of healthcare, noting that immigrants, particularly those on J or M visas, were essential to filling gaps in the medical field, particularly in areas with doctor shortages. She accused Republicans of exacerbating this crisis through their reckless visa policies, which threatened to reduce the number of foreign-trained doctors able to work in the U.S.

Crockett’s defense of immigration was not just theoretical; it was grounded in real-world examples. She highlighted the vital contributions immigrants made in various sectors of American life, arguing that without them, the country would face a significant economic and healthcare crisis.

### Attacking Republican Immigration Policies

As Crockett’s speech gained momentum, she turned her attention to the hypocrisy in the Republican stance on immigration. She referenced Melania Trump’s immigration process, pointing out the former First Lady’s own visa issues and the stark contrast between the way her immigration status was handled and the way immigrant workers are treated.

“Let me remind y’all that Melania, the first lady, applied for and was given an EB1 visa,” Crockett noted. This specific visa, known as the “Einstein visa,” is awarded to individuals with extraordinary abilities in fields like science, art, education, and athletics. “Last time I checked, the first lady had none of those accolades,” Crockett continued, drawing attention to the irony of a woman married to the former president benefiting from a visa that was supposedly reserved for the most exceptional individuals.

Her remark underscored the blatant double standard Republicans were pushing when it came to immigration. While demonizing immigrants seeking a better life in the U.S., they ignored their own privileged circumstances.

### The Closing Argument: Protecting Immigrants, Protecting America

In her closing, Crockett returned to the central theme of her speech: the need for a balanced and fair immigration policy. She reminded her colleagues that the majority of immigrants were not criminals, but people who were improving the U.S. economy, advancing scientific research, and addressing critical labor shortages. By slashing visa programs and pushing harmful policies, Republicans were not securing the country—they were endangering it.

“Visas like the largely vetted J and M visas for higher education and trade attract the next innovators, medical providers, researchers, and educators that we need to build on American success,” she concluded. “And we cannot afford to lose that.”

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s speech was a masterclass in using facts, logic, and powerful rhetoric to dismantle a misguided and xenophobic narrative. By highlighting the contradictions in Republican immigration policy and defending the vital contributions of immigrants, Crockett showed the nation the importance of thoughtful, compassionate immigration reform. In one fell swoop, she not only exposed the flaws in her colleagues’ arguments but also reminded the country of the true value that immigrants bring to the United States.