On the Senate floor, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) sounded off on the purchase on over 200 radio stations by George Soros.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

The Implications of George Soros’s Acquisition of WWL Radio: A Reflection on Power and Influence

Last week, President Biden delivered a Farewell Address that resonated with many Americans. Among his remarks, he issued a stark warning about the “dangerous concentration of power in the hands of very few ultra-wealthy people.” He described the emergence of an oligarchy in America, characterized by extreme wealth, power, and influence that threatens democracy and the basic rights and freedoms of citizens. This statement raises critical questions about the implications of wealth concentration in media ownership, particularly in light of recent developments involving billionaire George Soros.

George Soros, one of the wealthiest individuals globally, has recently made headlines for his acquisition of WWL AM radio in New Orleans. This station, a staple in Louisiana since 1922, is a Class A Clear Channel station with a powerful transmitter output of 50,000 watts. It serves as the lead station for the New Orleans Saints radio network and has a significant influence on public opinion in the region. Soros’s purchase of WWL is not merely a business transaction; it represents a shift in media ownership that could have far-reaching consequences.

The acquisition came about after Odyssey, the national company that owned WWL, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to overwhelming debt of approximately $1.9 billion. Soros seized the opportunity to buy $415 million of this debt at a fraction of its value, effectively becoming the largest single shareholder in WWL and other radio stations across the country. This move raises concerns about the implications of such concentrated ownership in the media landscape.

In the United States, the airwaves used by radio stations are considered public property, owned by the American people. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established to regulate these airwaves and ensure they are used responsibly. Any transfer of broadcast licenses, especially involving significant foreign ownership, typically undergoes rigorous scrutiny by the FCC. However, Soros’s acquisition was approved with surprising speed and minimal investigation, raising questions about the integrity of the process.

Critics have pointed out that the approval of Soros’s purchase was expedited, bypassing the usual protocols that would typically require a thorough examination of the implications of such a significant transfer of media power. The decision was made along party lines, with three Democratic commissioners voting in favor and two Republican commissioners expressing concerns about the lack of due diligence. This has led to accusations of political interference and manipulation of administrative processes.

The implications of Soros’s acquisition extend beyond the realm of business. Media ownership plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and influencing political opinions. With Soros’s history of funding progressive causes and candidates, there are legitimate concerns about the potential for bias in the content broadcasted by WWL and other stations under his control. Critics argue that this concentration of media power could lead to a homogenization of viewpoints, stifling dissenting opinions and undermining the diversity of perspectives that are essential for a healthy democracy.

Moreover, Soros’s past statements regarding the United States and its role in the world raise further alarm. He has referred to the U.S. as “the main obstacle to a stable and just world” and has expressed admiration for China’s governance. Such views, coupled with his financial influence over media outlets, could result in a narrative that aligns with his ideological beliefs rather than serving the interests of the broader public.

In light of these developments, it is essential for the American public to remain vigilant about the implications of concentrated media ownership. The concerns raised by President Biden in his Farewell Address resonate strongly in this context. The potential for an oligarchy to shape public opinion and influence democratic processes is a threat that must be addressed.

Organizations like the Media Research Center have voiced their apprehensions about Soros’s intentions, warning that his acquisition could lead to a manipulation of media narratives to advance a specific agenda. The FCC’s decision to expedite the approval process for Soros’s purchase has raised questions about the agency’s credibility and its commitment to safeguarding the public interest.

As George Soros takes control of WWL AM radio and other stations, the implications of this acquisition extend far beyond the realm of business. It represents a significant shift in media ownership that could influence public discourse and democratic processes in the United States. The concerns raised by President Biden about the concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals are more relevant than ever.

In a democracy, it is crucial to ensure that diverse voices are heard and that media ownership does not become a tool for advancing specific ideological agendas. The American public must remain engaged and hold regulatory bodies accountable to protect the integrity of the media landscape. As we navigate these challenges, it is essential to remember that a healthy democracy relies on a free and diverse press that serves the interests of all citizens, not just a select few.