In a surprising turn of events, WNBA star Brittney Griner has chosen Angel Reese to compete in the 3×3 Olympics, following an injury to Cameron Brink.
Griner’s decision, and her accompanying statement that “Angel Reese is better than Caitlin Clark,” has ignited a fierce debate among basketball fans on social media.
Griner’s choice to invite Reese over Clark has raised eyebrows, given Clark’s high profile and stellar performances in recent college seasons. However, Griner’s confidence in Reese’s abilities speaks volumes about her potential and skill set.
→ Swipe to see more articles
Angel Reese, known for her dynamic play and versatility on the court, has been making waves since her college days. Her inclusion in the 3×3 Olympics team alongside Griner is seen as a testament to her rising star status in the basketball world.
On the other hand, Caitlin Clark has garnered significant attention for her scoring prowess and leadership. Fans of Clark were quick to voice their disappointment and disagreement with Griner’s assessment, arguing that Clark’s statistics and impact on games make her the superior choice.
The debate has flooded social media platforms, with fans and analysts weighing in on the merits of each player.
Supporters of Reese argue that her all-around game and defensive capabilities make her a more balanced player, while Clark’s advocates emphasize her exceptional shooting and playmaking abilities.
Griner’s comment has added fuel to an already passionate discussion about the future stars of women’s basketball. As the 3×3 Olympics approach, all eyes will be on Reese to see if she can live up to the expectations set by Griner’s endorsement.
In the meantime, the basketball community remains divided, eagerly anticipating how this decision will play out on the international stage and what it means for the careers of both Reese and Clark.
