Cubs Rookie Outperforms Big Name, Yet Misses All-Star Nod!

Chicago Cubs fans have expressed subdued enthusiasm in this year’s All-Star Game voting, which isn’t surprising given the team’s current standings. After a soggy victory against the Angels this past Sunday, the Cubs are 11 games back from the Milwaukee Brewers in the NL Central, and they’re holding on to a slim chance at a wild card playoff spot.

This year, the Cubs will send just one representative to the All-Star Game in Arlington: pitcher Shota Imanaga. Imanaga’s selection was independent of fan voting, which perhaps explains his inclusion over some of his teammates who might have warranted consideration based on their performances. Outfielders Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki, along with pitcher Justin Steele—who recently threw a complete game—are some of the names that come to mind.

However, it is Michael Busch, the Cubs first baseman, whose omission from the All-Star roster seems particularly unjust. Despite ranking fourth among NL first basemen in weighted runs created plus (wRC+), he will not be participating, while the Mets’ Pete Alonso will make the trip to Texas.

It’s not that Alonso hasn’t performed; his home run numbers and RBIs are formidable as ever. However, Busch has kept pace despite less opportunity, given the struggles of the Cubs’ lineup to consistently generate hits and RBI opportunities.

This season Busch boasts a slash line of .264/.360/.449 with a 130 wRC+, while Alonso has a line of .243/.325/.467, translating to a 126 wRC+. Busch also outpaces Alonso in walk rate and shows a significant gap in defensive metrics, with Busch recorded at -2.2 defensive runs saved compared to Alonso’s -10.2.

Interestingly, both players find themselves overshadowed by Arizona’s Christian Walker, who leads with a 2.9 fWAR compared to Busch’s 1.9 and Alonso’s 1.2. Walker’s performance might be setting the benchmark for first basemen this season.

While rumors earlier this year linked Alonso to potential deals with the Cubs, it is Busch who is emerging as a key figure for the team’s future. Even though he may not be making an All-Star appearance this time, his burgeoning career suggests that Chicago may indeed have found their long-term answer at first base.

Related Posts

‘Jeopardy!’ champion reveals show’s problem that’s been causing fans to rage

‘Jeopardy!’ champion reveals show’s problem that’s been causing fans to rage LOS ANGELES – “Jeopardy!” is still a game show mainstay for many viewers, but there is no denying…

Intense Jeopardy! Clash: Scott Riccardi’s Heart-Stopping Battle in a ‘Real Shoot-Out’ Leaves Fans Breathless—Discover the Shocking Twist That Changed Everything in This Epic Game!

‘Jeopardy!’: Riccardi Faces Off in What Jennings Calls a ‘Real Shoot-Out’ ‘Jeopardy!’ Champ Scott Riccardi Caught in Crossfire in a Game Jennings Called a ‘Real Shoot-Out’ Jeopardy.com…

Jeopardy! fans shocked at Invitational Tournament frontrunner’s loss & reveal reason they were ‘rooting against’ his win

Jeopardy! fans shocked at Invitational Tournament frontrunner’s loss & reveal reason they were ‘rooting against’ his win JEOPARDY! fans are shocked the frontrunner to take home the…

Shocking Demands from ‘Jeopardy!’ Fans: Unbelievable Changes They’re Demanding for Season 42 That Could Transform the Iconic Game Show Forever!

‘Jeopardy!’ Fans Want These Major Changes for Season 42 Jeopardy! YouTube Next fall, Jeopardy! will be entering its 42nd season. Quite a run for any show, but especially impressive…

Shocking ‘Jeopardy!’ Upset: Scott Riccardi’s Unforgettable Win Sparks Outrage and Intrigue Among Fans—What Did He Do That Left Everyone Speechless? The Drama Unfolds!

‘Jeopardy!’ Fans React After Scott Riccardi’s Stunning Win ‘Jeopardy!’ Scott Riccardi’s Stunning Win Has Fans Saying the Same Thing Jeopardy! Inc ‘Jeopardy!’ contestants from July 11, 2025…

‘Jeopardy!’ Gets More Backlash After Show Allows Champ’s Mispronunciation

ABC Some Jeopardy! viewers were left with a bad taste in their mouths after the judges allowed the returning champ to pronounce “Apéritif” incorrectly. The ruling didn’t impact the…