While most fans attribute Angel Reese’s potential beef with Caitlin Clark to her lack of recognition in uplifting women’s basketball, Jason Whitlock’s recent ugly tirade against the Chicago Sky rookie unveiled a different perspective. According to the 57-year-old podcaster, the disparity in their skill sets is the root cause of Reese’s perceived dislike for the Indiana Fever guard. Speaking on his podcast, Whitlock started off by criticizing Reese’s playing style to offensive voids, running style, and body language, only to label her as the ‘most overrated athlete’ in all of the sports.

“Angel Reese is arguably the most overrated athlete in all of sports. She is as unskilled as any player in the WNBA. She is awkward, look at the way she runs,” Whitlock said. “She is incredibly unathletic. She has no skill, no postgame. Candace Parker, I’m sure, watches her and laughs…This woman is a rebounder, and that’s it. She has no other skill, that’s why she hates Caitlin Clark so much.”

Has Angel Reese disappointed in her rookie campaign?

During her two seasons at LSU, Reese showcased her versatility as a two-way threat, averaging 20.8 points on 49.8% shooting from the field, 14.4 rebounds, and 1.8 steals per game. These impressive stats raised expectations about Reese’s well-rounded game and ability to dominate the paint using her 6’3” frame.

However, since making her transition into the WNBA, Angel has struggled to replicate that same dominance from her collegiate basketball days, particularly on the offensive end. In her first 13 games, she averaged 12.1 points on 37.1% shooting from the field. Citing the disparity, Whitlock’s guest, Steve Kim, added to the scathing critique, suggesting that the Maryland native is garnering more attention than her current level of play warrants.

“She basically has the game of Joakim Noah, and she is talked about like she is Derrick Rose,” Kim added. “No disrespect to Joakim Noah, you’re a really good player. Two-time national titlist, my respect to you.”

Does Reese warrant so much hate?

Given Sky’s abysmal 2-8 record in their last 10 games, which has dropped them to the 9th seed, it undoubtedly encouraged naysayers like Jason to target Reese. However, it is worth noting that even the greatest WNBA players have required time to adjust to the league’s demands.

In just 13 games, Reese is not only averaging 12.1 points per game, the third-highest scoring average on her team, but her rebounding prowess is also a significant contributor to the Sky’s fifth-best defensive rating in the league.

Furthermore, the 22-year-old ranks fourth in rebounds per game, leads the league in offensive rebounds, and has the fifth-most steals per game. These statistics suggest that, as a newcomer to the WNBA, Reese’s impact is already substantial, and her potential for further growth is indeed promising.

Hot news:

Elon Musk Sues The View and Whoopi Goldberg for $60 Million – Claims They Are Lying About Him

In a move that has left many scratching their heads, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has filed a $60 million lawsuit against Whoopi Goldberg and The View. According to Musk, the talk show hosts have been spreading lies about him and his companies, and he’s had enough.

In a statement released to the press, Musk said, “It’s time to set the record straight. The View has been spreading lies about me and my businesses for far too long.

They’ve made unfounded accusations, questioned my integrity, and tried to paint me as some sort of villain. Well, enough is enough.”

The lawsuit, which was filed in a Los Angeles court, accuses Goldberg and the other hosts of making defamatory statements about Musk and his companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.

Among the allegations are claims that The View has accused Musk of cutting corners on safety, mistreating employees, and engaging in unethical business practices.

But some experts are skeptical of Musk’s claims. “This seems like a bit of an overreaction,” said legal analyst Karen Johnson. “The View is a talk show, and talk shows are known for being opinionated.

It’s not like they’re reporting news or conducting investigations. They’re just giving their thoughts on current events, and sometimes those thoughts are critical of people like Elon Musk.”

Despite the criticism, Musk is standing by his decision to sue. “I’m not saying that The View can’t have opinions,” he said.

“But when those opinions are based on lies and misinformation, it’s time to take action. I won’t stand by and let my reputation be destroyed by a bunch of talking heads on a daytime TV show.”

Only time will tell how this lawsuit will play out, but one thing’s for sure: Elon Musk is not backing down.

Hot news:

Kevin Costner Turns Down Multi-Million Collaboration Offer From Robert De Niro – “He’s Creepy”

In an arena where the stakes are immense and budgets soar, Hollywood has witnessed numerous unexpected occurrences. However, none have quite matched the recent bombshell that Kevin Costner, a revered figure in cinema, declined a staggering $100 million movie deal. What makes this refusal particularly astonishing is Costner’s explanation—a perceived “creepiness” associated with the legendary Robert De Niro.

This revelation has sent shockwaves through Hollywood, evoking a blend of curiosity, disbelief, and even some amusement. Costner, known for his roles in classics such as “Dances with Wolves” and “The Bodyguard,” has always epitomized stoic charm and unwavering professionalism. His decision to turn down such a lucrative offer from De Niro, an equally respected peer, has sparked a flurry of questions and speculation.

The project in question, rumored to be an epic cinematic venture, promised to be a potential blockbuster. With a budget rivaling that of a small country’s GDP, the endeavor was poised to be a crowning achievement for both actors. De Niro, a cultural icon renowned for roles in films like “Taxi Driver” and “The Godfather,” has long been associated with high-profile, high-budget productions.

The collaboration between these two titans of the silver screen was anticipated to be nothing short of cinematic brilliance. Fans and critics alike were preparing for an announcement, eager to mark their calendars for what would undoubtedly be a historic release.

Yet, in a twist that could be mistaken for a plot twist in a Hollywood comedy, Costner’s rationale for declining the offer has become the focal point. By describing De Niro’s demeanor or perhaps some aspect of the deal as “creepy,” Costner has flipped the script on typical Hollywood negotiations.

Costner’s use of the term “creepy” adds an intriguing layer to the narrative. In an industry known for embracing the unusual and extravagant, what could possibly have triggered such a reaction from an actor of Costner’s stature? Was it something in De Niro’s behavior, an element of the proposed screenplay, or a facet of the production that set off Costner’s “creepy” radar?

The response from Hollywood insiders has been a mix of amusement and fascination. Some view Costner’s decision as a bold, albeit unconventional, stand for personal comfort over financial gain. Others speculate about the deeper implications of the term “creepy” in an industry no stranger to behind-the-scenes controversies.

De Niro’s reaction has been typically understated. Known for his reserved demeanor both on and off screen, he has chosen not to publicly address the “creepy” remark. This silence only deepens the mystery and speculation surrounding the entire episode.

Kevin Costner’s decision and the rationale behind it could have ripple effects in Hollywood. The idea that a deal could be declined not only on professional grounds but also due to personal perceptions of “creepiness” introduces a new dynamic in negotiations among stars. Might this incident encourage other actors to heed their instincts more closely when considering roles, irrespective of the financial lure?

Furthermore, this incident prompts reflection on the nature of actor collaborations. Hollywood has always been a melting pot of strong personalities and artistic visions. The chemistry between actors, often cultivated off-screen, is crucial to the success of any project. Costner’s rejection of the deal with De Niro underscores the importance of personal dynamics in such collaborations.

There is a satirical edge to this tale that cannot be overlooked. The notion of a Hollywood icon turning down a colossal deal over “creepiness” reads like a scene from a parody. It’s the kind of storyline that pokes fun at the sometimes surreal nature of the film industry, where reality can indeed be stranger than fiction.

In a way, this incident serves as a reminder of the unique world that is Hollywood—a place where the line between personal and professional lives often blurs, and where the decisions of its stars can be as unpredictable as the plot twists in their movies.

Kevin Costner’s rejection of a $100 million movie deal with Robert De Niro is destined to become one of the most peculiar and talked-about incidents in Hollywood history. It encapsulates the essence of the film industry—unpredictable, dramatic, and endlessly captivating.

Whether Costner’s sensitivity to “creepiness” sets a new precedent in Hollywood or remains a quirky footnote in his career remains to be seen. One thing is certain though: in the realm of glamour and glitz, where the bizarre often reigns supreme, this story fits right in. It’s a narrative that captures the mystique, allure, and sheer unpredictability of Hollywood.